On a typical dairy farm, the milking process contributes about 60% of the risk of mastitis on that farm.

clinical-case

Countdown has given us a great set of definitions for best practice, and Dairy Focus has now added the ability to precisely assess and measure each element of mastitis risk in the dairy and then combine them into an Overall Mastitis Risk Score.

Whilst we commonly think we are doing everything right, the cows are healthy, and the machines are tested and OK, objective measuring has been very interesting.

We have now scored the mastitis risks in nearly 100 dairy sheds using the Dairy Focus Mastitis Risk Assessment, and not a single dairy has come up “Low Risk” for mastitis at their first assessment!

The most common factors contributing to the mastitis risk on these farms were –

  • Teat disinfection

Teat disinfection (spraying or dipping) is the most important mastitis control measure in the dairy. Gold standard is 100% coverage of 100% of teats, and this is difficult to achieve on a regular basis.

At our first assessment, we regularly find herds struggling to achieve 50% coverage, and few are achieving better than 75%.

teat spray2

Some farms are also not using a Ready-to-Use (RTU) product, exposing themselves to mixing and water quality issues.

It seems high quality teat disinfection remains a challenge on most farms - one key to success here is to have staff training and a team approach with regular peer assessment.

  • Teat end condition

Teat end health is a critically important part of the cow’s defence against mastitis infections, and the milking process combined with wet cold & windy weather has seen both teat end condition and teat skin condition decline in many herds.

Teat end health can only be effectively assessed by an experienced person scoring the teat condition in the herd - cursory and/or subjective assessments are often highly misleading!

Once assessed and measured, the appropriate changes to milking machine setup(e.g. liner selection, vacuum level, etc) and milking routine (e.g. reduced overmilking) will rapidly result in teat end health improving and a re-assessment and measurement can be made 3 – 4 weeks later.

rough skin2

The wet, cold weather has also impacted on teat skin condition in many herds, causing dry, chapped skin. The addition of extra emollient for a short period (about a week) will often rapidly improve the skin condition, and the RTU spray will usually then maintain it quite well.

  • Less than ideal liner selection

A large number of herds showed evidence of teat damage and/or excessive cup slip attributable to the liners being used.

Liner selection for a herd is a complex issue and the best choice is generally made after observing a milking, scoring teats and assessing the teat size and condition of the herd.

  • Vacuum level not ideal for the herd

Milking time testing of actual claw vacuums in association with teat scoring and milking time observations is the only way to be absolutely sure that the vacuum is at the optimum level for the herd and the milking system.

milking time testing1

Often, subtle changes of only 1 - 2 kPa in the operating vacuum can make a significant difference to teat condition and milking performance – achieving optimum vacuum level lowered the mastitis risk in a significant number of herds.

  • Milking technique (especially cups off)

Cups off is the most important milking position in the dairy, because less than ideal cup removal causes impacts of vacuum to force milk droplets and bacteria into the teat canal of other quarters during the cups off process, thereby spreading infection in much the same way that cup slip does.

Pausing to let the cups drop after breaking the vacuum is critically important in a manual cup removal system, just as correct adjustment of take-off thresholds, delays and retraction speeds is equally important in automatic cup removal (ACR) systems.

cups off

If cups do not “drop” within about 3 seconds after the vacuum is broken, it is likely that there is a milking machine or milking routine issue that needs to be addressed.

Milking machine maintenance and adjustment plus staff training are again likely to be an important part of achieving best practice in cup removal.

Summary

The outcomes and results for herds that have been able to manage and reduce these risks to become “Low Risk” for mastitis in the dairy are consistently outstanding.

Because the milking process influences the risk of both environmental and contagious mastitis, these “Low Risk” herds have commonly negotiated the wet, muddy weather and early lactation with minimal impact on cell counts and clinical case rates.

Mapping these herds’ Overall Mastitis Risk Score against Bulk Milk Cell Count (BMCC) clearly shows the BMCC following the risk score down.

bmcc_track

The lessons are clear –

Most dairies can make significant improvements to lower their mastitis risk – even dairies that already have low cell counts often still have significant mastitis risks

It is difficult to “self assess” what is happening in your own dairy – trained professionals pick up things that we can easily miss

It is not easy to be “Low Risk” for mastitis in the dairy, but it is achievable, and the results are really worthwhile

 

For more information, contact the Dairy Focus office on (03) 58590706

 

Go to top